Skip to content
YouTube2.5B+ monthly logged-in users2 services not ranked

YouTube SMM panel prices

YouTube carries the highest prices per unit of any platform on SMM panels and the most delivery risk, because its systems audit view sources aggressively. It is also where the catalogue’s clearest unit trap lives: watch hours are ordered per 1,000 order-quantity, and that quantity converts into real hours at a rate set by the video length each panel demands.

Data captured from 54 panelsdaily price index

Rates on this page were read from panels’ own API catalogue endpoints or read from the price lists panels publish on their own sites — every listing says which on its service page, most recently on . Nothing here is an estimate, a reference range or a figure carried over from a page that no longer exists.

Which is the best SMM panel for YouTube?

Panels ranked on their YouTube prices against the market median for each service, weighted evenly with their measured overall score. 37 panels sell enough of these services to be ranked.

ReliableSMM ranks first on YouTube today, at 0.21× the market median across the services below. The table prints each panel’s entry price per service, so you can check the order against the thing you are actually buying.

Best YouTube SMM panels, ranked on YouTube prices. Prices are per 1,000 units, read from each panel’s own catalogue.
#PanelSubscribersper 1,000Viewsper 1,000Likesper 1,000Shorts Viewsper 1,000Commentsper 1,000vs marketmedian of ratiosTrustOverall
1ReliableSMMreliablesmm.com$0.0037$0.146$0.184$0.165$0.1190.21×829.6
2ApiSMMapismm.com$0.0035$0.251$0.200$0.338$0.1270.19×779.4
3Likeolikeo.net$0.0020$0.182$0.060$0.338$0.1340.18×789.1
4SmmBindsmmbind.com$0.091$0.401$0.301$1.00$0.00110.37×769.1
5LionFollowlionfollow.com$0.0048$0.347$0.184$0.780$0.1200.19×848.9
6SMM Panel Providesmmpanelprovide.com$0.010$0.171$0.200Shorts Views: not verified$0.5180.21×768.7
7Smm resellers Hubsmmresellershub.com$9.00$0.300$0.260$1.28$0.1820.41×898.7
8YtResellersytresellers.com$0.061$0.209$0.545$0.633Comments: not verified0.53×799.1
9SMMPodsmmpod.com$0.0049$0.190$0.270Shorts Views: not verified$0.2100.19×738.6
10Bulk Medyabulkmedya.org$0.091$0.241$0.481$0.748$0.1210.41×708.4

Which YouTube service are you buying?

Cheapest is the lowest single listing; median is the middle of every listing for that service. The Panels column is how many independent sellers the row rests on — dotted and amber below the threshold this site publishes a ranking at.

24,007 listed rates from 54 panels, read . Wide enough to read as a market rate.

YouTube service prices per 1,000, Oct 22, 2026, with the number of panels behind each median.
ServiceCheapest / 1kMedian / 1kDearest / 1kPanelsListingsCheapest at
Subscribersmost searched$0.00010$18.78$21,646.1952 panels1.4KFortuneSMM
Viewsmost searched$0.0011$2.01$8,834.1254 panels10KBestOfPanel
Likesmost searched$0.0011$1.08$14,250.0054 panels3.3KBestOfPanel
Shares$0.143$1.43$135.8433 panels2.2KBulk Medya
Comments$0.0011$3.85$4,497.0054 panels3.1KSmmBind
Premiere Views$0.135$1.97$12.1116 panels83SMM Heaven
Dislikes$0.120$2.24$91.2017 panels112PRM4U
Playlist Views$9.17$120.00$120.002 panels — below the publication threshold15TheLordOfThePanels
Shorts Views$0.165$2.97$240.9938 panels626ReliableSMM
Shorts Likes$0.401$1.62$13.0019 panels95SmmBind

Which YouTube services can’t be ranked per 1,000?

These are listed alphabetically, with their rates as a range, and deliberately put in no price order. A ranking would assert that the rows describe the same amount of the same thing. They do not.

YouTube services sold in a unit that is not comparable per 1,000. Not ranked.
ServiceWhat one unit actually isRates seenPanels
Live Stream Viewersper 1,000 viewer-slots (session length varies)$0.036 – $9,999,999,999.0050 panels
Watch Hoursper 1,000 hours$1.05 – $1,560.0041 panels

What are you actually buying on YouTube?

Subscribers, views, likes and comments are public counts. Shares are recorded in the channel’s own analytics and are not visible on the video, so delivery on that row is verifiable only from inside the account.

Panels distinguish low-retention views, which stop within seconds, from high-retention views that watch a substantial share of the video — and price them very differently. Retention is expressed only in listing text, never in a structured field, so two rows at the same rate can deliver completely different watch behaviour.

Dislikes are on every price list and act on someone else’s video. This site lists that row for completeness, carries no outbound link on it, and excludes it from every ranking. YouTube also removed the public dislike counter in 2021, so the practical effect of such an order is confined to the target channel’s private analytics.

Where do YouTube unit prices mislead?

Watch hours are the most important unit trap in this catalogue. The quantity a buyer orders is not a number of hours: it is an order quantity that converts into real watch time according to the video length the panel requires, and that requirement ranges across listings from a couple of minutes to two hours or more. Two panels quoting the same per-1,000 figure can be selling amounts of watch time that differ several-fold. Every incumbent directory ranks this row cheapest-first beside ordinary count services; this site prints each panel’s own listing text next to the rate so the length requirement is visible, and refuses to order them.

Live stream viewers are the familiar viewer-slot trap: sold per 1,000 slots for a duration the panel sets, typically in blocks of minutes stated only in listing copy. Listed unranked.

Shorts views are counted separately from long-form views and delivered through a different endpoint, so a row titled simply "views" will not necessarily move a Short. That is a naming hazard rather than a unit trap, but it produces the same wasted order.

What separates a cheap YouTube listing from an expensive one?

Retention is the axis that matters on views and it is the one panels are least structured about. A row promising ten minutes of watch time and one promising nothing are the same product category at very different prices, and only the listing text distinguishes them.

On subscribers, the distinction panels draw is whether the subscribing account has any watch history. An account that has never watched anything is cheaper and is the first thing a platform cleanup removes.

Likes bought without views produce a like-to-view ratio no organic video has, which is the most common way an order becomes obvious. Panels sell the two separately and do not warn about the interaction.

What does YouTube itself say about bought engagement?

YouTube’s own rule: YouTube doesn’t allow anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metrics either by using automatic systems or serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers.

Fake engagement policy · fetched

Watch hours are bought almost exclusively to cross a monetisation threshold, which is precisely the use YouTube audits for. That makes it the row in this catalogue with the highest fraud rate and the highest platform exposure at once, and it is why the service carries a risk flag in our own data rather than only in prose.

A subscriber count that falls after a cleanup is publicly visible and is one of the signals reviewers and sponsors use to identify bought growth. The durability of the order, not its price, is what decides whether that happens.

Which panels sell YouTube services?

The 10 highest-scoring of 56 panels that list YouTube on their storefront. Listing a platform is their claim; the prices above are the ones we have actually read.

Panels selling YouTube services
#PanelScoreTrustFrom / 1kServicesAPIRefillDripChildGeoActions
1Smm resellers Hub Verified ownersmmresellershub.com8.789/100High trust$0.00060597Smm resellers Hub API access: yesSmm resellers Hub Refill guarantee: yesSmm resellers Hub Drip-feed: yesSmm resellers Hub Child panels: yesSmm resellers Hub Geo-targeting: yesVisit
2TGLUX Verified ownersmmtglux.com8.589/100High trust$0.0018977TGLUX API access: yesTGLUX Refill guarantee: yesTGLUX Drip-feed: noTGLUX Child panels: yesTGLUX Geo-targeting: yesVisit
3incresermaster Verified ownerincresermaster.com8.375/100Established$0.000602.3Kincresermaster API access: yesincresermaster Refill guarantee: yesincresermaster Drip-feed: yesincresermaster Child panels: yesincresermaster Geo-targeting: yesVisit
4NSBOOSTBD Verified ownernsboostbd.com8.090/100High trust$0.000808.2KNSBOOSTBD API access: yesNSBOOSTBD Refill guarantee: yesNSBOOSTBD Drip-feed: yesNSBOOSTBD Child panels: yesNSBOOSTBD Geo-targeting: yesVisit
5SocNet SMM Verified ownersocnet.pro7.378/100Established$0.01011.5KSocNet SMM API access: yesSocNet SMM Refill guarantee: yesSocNet SMM Drip-feed: yesSocNet SMM Child panels: not verifiedSocNet SMM Geo-targeting: yesVisit
6ReliableSMM Verified ownerreliablesmm.com9.682/100High trust$0.000504KReliableSMM API access: yesReliableSMM Refill guarantee: yesReliableSMM Drip-feed: yesReliableSMM Child panels: not verifiedReliableSMM Geo-targeting: yesVisit
7PanelFollows Verified ownerpanelfollows.com7.882/100High trust$0.00152.3KPanelFollows API access: yesPanelFollows Refill guarantee: yesPanelFollows Drip-feed: yesPanelFollows Child panels: yesPanelFollows Geo-targeting: yesVisit
8Boostero Verified ownerboostero.com6.689/100High trust$0.00401.3KBoostero API access: yesBoostero Refill guarantee: yesBoostero Drip-feed: yesBoostero Child panels: yesBoostero Geo-targeting: yesVisit
9ApiSMMapismm.com9.477/100Established$0.000602.6KApiSMM API access: yesApiSMM Refill guarantee: yesApiSMM Drip-feed: yesApiSMM Child panels: yesApiSMM Geo-targeting: yesVisit
10SmmCheapsmmcheap.com9.377/100Established$0.0011331SmmCheap API access: yesSmmCheap Refill guarantee: yesSmmCheap Drip-feed: yesSmmCheap Child panels: yesSmmCheap Geo-targeting: yesVisit

YouTube SMM panels: what buyers ask

Which is the best SMM panel for YouTube?

On the prices we read today, ReliableSMM. We rank panels on their YouTube catalogue specifically — subscribers, views, likes, shorts views, comments — priced against the market median for each of those services, weighted evenly with the panel’s measured overall score. ReliableSMM’s YouTube prices sit at 0.21× the market median and it scores 9.6/10 overall; ApiSMM and Likeo follow. 37 panels sell enough of those services to be ranked. The order moves as catalogues change. A sponsored panel can be pinned above position one, labelled and never numbered; no payment changes the numbered order.

How many panels are these YouTube prices based on?

Each YouTube median on this page rests on between 2 and 54 panels, drawn from 24,007 individual listings. The two numbers are different on purpose: one panel routinely lists dozens of variants of the same service, so the median is taken over listings while the sample size counts panels. This site publishes a ranking from 5 independent sellers up, and at least one service here clears that.

Why are YouTube watch hours not ranked cheapest-first here?

Because the number being ranked is not a price for an hour. Watch hours are ordered in quantities of 1,000 and priced per 1,000, but the quantity maps to real hours at a rate set by the video length the panel requires — stated in listing text and ranging from a couple of minutes to over two hours. A panel demanding a two-minute video and one demanding a two-hour video are quoting the same unit and delivering watch time that differs several-fold. Sorting those figures would rank the panel that discloses least at the top.

What is the difference between high-retention and ordinary YouTube views?

How long the view lasts, which is the only property of a view that matters for anything downstream. A low-retention view stops within seconds and moves the view counter; a high-retention view watches a substantial share of the video and contributes watch time. Panels price them very differently and express the difference only in listing text, so the rate alone tells you nothing about which you are buying.

Do you list YouTube dislikes?

Yes, and we carry no affiliate link on the row and exclude it from every ranking on the site. It acts on an account the buyer does not own, which is the definition this site uses for an attack service. Pretending it is not on every price list in the market would make the catalogue less honest rather than more; monetising it would make the site something other than what it claims to be.

Terms on this page

Each of these is a term buyers routinely read as meaning something it does not.

Watch hours
Purchased YouTube viewing time, priced per 1,000 quantity, not per 1,000 hours.
Monetizable views
Views claimed to count toward monetisation: unverifiable, and the highest-fraud row.
HR
High retention: a claim about durability rather than how the accounts look.
Refill
Replacement of dropped units within a stated window: a remedy, not a prediction.
Refill window
How long a refill can be claimed; longer windows are less reliably honoured.
Drop rate
The share of delivered units that disappear afterwards, for any reason.
Purge
A platform bulk-removing fake accounts; strips bought followers and spikes prices.
Attack service
Catalogue rows sold to damage a third party; tortious as well as ToS-violating.
Per 1000
The universal pricing unit: every catalogue rate is the cost of 1,000 units.
Shorts views
A separate YouTube product ranking on completion and rewatch; the specified tiers run dearer.
Premiere views
Countdown-room viewers: fixed size, ordered before the premiere, unrefillable afterwards.
Concurrent viewers
Viewer slots held for a duration, not a headcount; divide the rate by the hours.
Average view duration
How long viewers actually watch; cheap views raise the counter and lower this.
Platform terms breach
Every major platform prohibits bought engagement by name in its own published policy.

Where to go next

Lowest rankable YouTube rate on record today: $0.145 per 1,000, YouTube shares.