Instagram SMM panel prices

Followers, likes, comments and views are public counts: a visitor sees the number, and third-party trackers keep historical values, so a step change stays visible long after it happens. Saves, shares, impressions, reach and profile visits are private to the account’s own insights, which means a buyer cannot verify delivery on those rows from outside and is relying on the panel’s order status.

Panels title Reels views, feed video views and IGTV views as separate rows and use “plays” and “views” interchangeably across them, so a row title is not a reliable statement of which counter an order moves — the listing text is. The market’s usual practice is to sell one view inventory under several names.

What is not being bought on any row: reach among people who would have wanted the account. Every service here moves a number. None of them changes who the account is shown to by anything other than the mechanical effect of that number on ranking.

Live views are the one unit trap in the Instagram catalogue. They are billed per 1,000 viewer-slots, and a slot is held for a session length the panel chooses and usually does not publish in any structured field. That makes the per-1,000 figure a price for a duration as much as for an audience, so this site lists those rates and refuses to order them.

Story views are not a trap but are routinely misread: an order covers the latest story, a chosen number of recent stories, or every active story, and the multiplier between those is far larger than the difference between panels’ rates. Compare price per story, not per order.

Comment rows split into random and custom, which are different products rather than quality tiers of one. A random-comment row and a custom-comment row on the same panel should never be ranked against each other.

Delivery geography moves price further than any quality label does. Panels list worldwide and country-restricted delivery as separate rows sourced from separate pools, and a cheapest-first read of a mixed column recommends the worldwide row to every buyer who came for the country one.

The refill window is the second axis and panels price it accurately even where they do not explain it. A panel that undertakes to replace accounts that drop has to fund those replacements, so the gap between its cheapest no-refill row and its cheapest refill row is that panel’s own estimate of how much of the order it expects to lose.

Quality labels — bot, mixed, real, HQ, targeted — are each panel’s vocabulary, not a market standard. Two rows both labelled "real" on two different panels are not a like-for-like comparison, and this site does not treat them as one.