The Best SMM Panels, Ranked by Measured Data
Every panel in the index that is not flagged, ordered by overall score.
Coverage is still narrow. Live prices have been read from 1 of 129 panels (2,182 services). The rest are listed because they are real, reachable operators — not because we have seen their rates. Panels with no synced catalogue show no prices rather than an estimate. How the data is gathered.
Data captured from 129 panels
There are 21 of these, and that number is deliberately small. It would be trivial to generate one for every platform, country and feature flag we hold — and worthless, because a list whose filter matches nearly every panel is the main ranking with a different heading. Each list below either cuts the field down materially or ranks it by something the others do not.
Every panel in the index, ordered by a different question each time.
Every panel in the index that is not flagged, ordered by overall score.
Every panel in the index, ordered by the lowest live price anywhere in its catalogue, then by overall score.
Panels scoring at least 60 out of 100 on trust, ordered by trust score.
Panels that expose an order API and provision child panels, scoring at least 50 on trust, ordered by the number of services we can price.
Ranked on prices measured for that platform’s own services, not on a general score with a platform label.
Panels selling at least three of Instagram followers, likes, video views, reels views and story views, ranked by their prices for those five services weighted evenly with their overall score.
Panels selling at least three of TikTok followers, likes, views, shares and comments, ranked by their prices for those five services weighted evenly with their overall score.
Panels selling at least three of YouTube subscribers, views, likes, shorts views and comments, ranked by their prices for those five services weighted evenly with their overall score.
Panels selling at least three of Telegram channel members, group members, post views, story views and comments, ranked by their prices for those services weighted evenly with their overall score.
Panels selling at least three of Spotify plays, monthly listeners, followers, playlist followers and saves, ranked by their prices for those services weighted evenly with their overall score.
Panels that actually have the feature, ranked by whatever makes that feature worth having.
Panels exposing an order API and scoring at least 50 on trust, ordered by measured 30-day uptime.
Panels that provision child panels, ordered by trust score.
Panels that publish a refill guarantee, ordered by trust score.
Panels we have verified offer free trial credit or a free test order, ordered by trust score.
Verified at the panel’s checkout, because payment pages go stale faster than anything else.
Defined by the payment rail a buyer in that market can fund with — the part we can verify.
Panels we have verified accept UPI, ordered by the lowest live price anywhere in the catalogue.
Panels we have verified accept Papara, ordered by overall score.
Panels with a minimum deposit of $2 or less, ordered by the lowest live price anywhere in the catalogue.
Panels we have verified accept Binance Pay, ordered by overall score.
Panels we have verified accept USDT, ordered by the lowest live price anywhere in the catalogue.
Panels we have verified accept bKash, ordered by the lowest live price anywhere in the catalogue.
Each list declares a filter set and a sort key that the query layer understands, and the page renders whatever comes back. The overall score weights price position at 30%, trust at 30%, features at 18%, reliability at 14% and support at 8%; every input is an observation with a date attached — a WHOIS record, an HTTP probe, a price read from the panel’s own catalogue, a review a moderator verified. Affiliate status appears nowhere in the formula, which is checkable: the scoring file is published and you can search it.
Platform rankings work differently, because almost every panel in the index sells Instagram and TikTok services and filtering on that would return the whole field in the same order as the main list. Those pages instead price each panel’s catalogue for that platform’s own services against the market median for those same services, and rank on the result alongside the overall score. The prices behind the calculation are printed in the table on each page.
Lists last regenerated Sep 7, 2026. Read the full methodology.
A ranking answers “which of these many”. For “which of these two”, the comparison builder puts up to four panels in one table with their catalogue overlap, so you can see whether they are genuine substitutes before you compare their prices.