PanelFollows
5.0overallPrices 39% below the market median. 40/100 trust (unproven).
Coverage is still narrow. Live prices have been read from 1 of 129 panels (2,182 services). The rest are listed because they are real, reachable operators — not because we have seen their rates. Panels with no synced catalogue show no prices rather than an estimate. How the data is gathered.
Spotify promotion is bought by a different audience from the rest of this market — artists and labels rather than resellers — and it carries a risk the rest does not: royalties from streams Spotify judges artificial are withheld, and the label can be charged for them.
How this ranking is produced: Panels selling at least three of Spotify plays, monthly listeners, followers, playlist followers and saves, ranked by their prices for those services weighted evenly with their overall score. The order is generated by that query at build time — there is no editorial override anywhere in it.
Data captured from 1 panels
Only 1 panel matches this filter, which is too few for a ranking to mean much. The page is kept out of search results until it has more behind it.
Prices 39% below the market median. 40/100 trust (unproven).
| # | Panel | Playsper 1,000 | Monthly Listenersper 1,000 | Followersper 1,000 | Playlist Followersper 1,000 | Savesper 1,000 | vs marketmedian of ratios | Trust | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PanelFollowspanelfollows.com | $0.178 | $2.49 | $0.303 | $145.55 | $0.318 | 0.61× | 40 | 5.0 |
A dash means we have not verified that value, which is different from a zero. Price position is a median against the market, so it is not distorted by a panel listing one unusually cheap service.
It is financial, not cosmetic. Spotify’s artificial-streaming policy allows it to withhold royalties on streams it identifies as inauthentic and, since 2024, to charge distributors a per-track fee when flagged activity is detected — a cost that distributors pass to the artist. That makes Spotify the one platform in this index where a cheap purchase can end up costing more than it saves. Nothing on this page changes that calculus; it exists so that a buyer who has decided to proceed can at least see the real prices and the panels’ measured reliability instead of a sponsored list.
Five things, priced very differently. Plays are the cheapest and the most scrutinised. Monthly listeners are derived from plays rather than sold directly, so a panel selling them is selling plays spread across distinct accounts, which is why they cost more. Followers and playlist followers are account actions and are priced closer to social-platform follower rates. Saves are the least common and the most variable. The price table on each service page shows the full spread; the ranking above is the median position across all five. One thing no panel sells, whatever the listing says, is placement on an editorial playlist. Services described that way are either user-generated playlists with bought followers or a bot network, and both are what Spotify’s detection is built to find. The distinction matters commercially: a play from a real listener can convert into a follow and a save, while a play from a farm cannot, which is why the cheapest end of this category has no upside at all beyond the number on the counter.