ReliableSMM
9.6overallPrices 84% below the market median. 82/100 trust (high trust). 100.0% uptime.
Telegram is the one platform in this market where the buyers are frequently the same people who run panels, which makes it unusually price-competitive and unusually well supplied. This ranking prices each panel’s Telegram catalogue against the market median for the same Telegram services.
How this ranking is produced: Panels selling at least three of Telegram channel members, group members, post views, story views and comments, ranked by their prices for those services weighted evenly with their overall score. The order is generated by that query at build time. There is no editorial override anywhere in it.
Data captured from 37 panels
Prices 84% below the market median. 82/100 trust (high trust). 100.0% uptime.
Prices 73% below the market median. 78/100 trust (established). 100.0% uptime.
Prices 92% below the market median. 76/100 trust (established). 99.2% uptime.
Prices 86% below the market median. 76/100 trust (established). 99.2% uptime.
Prices 79% below the market median. 73/100 trust (established). 99.2% uptime.
Prices 76% below the market median. 83/100 trust (high trust). 97.5% uptime.
Prices 78% below the market median. 71/100 trust (established). 100.0% uptime.
Prices 52% below the market median. 84/100 trust (high trust). 98.3% uptime.
Prices 50% below the market median. 77/100 trust (established). 100.0% uptime.
Prices 77% below the market median. 77/100 trust (established). 100.0% uptime.
Prices 85% below the market median. 71/100 trust (established). 100.0% uptime.
Prices 45% below the market median. 70/100 trust (established). 99.2% uptime.
Prices 50% below the market median. 79/100 trust (established). 99.2% uptime.
Prices 64% below the market median. 77/100 trust (established). 100.0% uptime.
Prices 47% below the market median. 85/100 trust (high trust). 100.0% uptime.
| # | Panel | Channel Membersper 1,000 | Group Membersper 1,000 | Post Viewsper 1,000 | Story Viewsper 1,000 | Post Commentsper 1,000 | vs marketmedian of ratios | Trust | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ReliableSMMreliablesmm.com | $0.011 | $0.092 | $0.0014 | Story Views: not verified | Post Comments: not verified | 0.16× | 82 | 9.6 |
| 2 | Likeolikeo.net | $0.160 | Group Members: not verified | $0.00030 | $0.026 | $1.80 | 0.27× | 78 | 9.1 |
| 3 | SmmBindsmmbind.com | $0.0063 | $0.042 | $0.0015 | Story Views: not verified | Post Comments: not verified | 0.08× | 76 | 9.1 |
| 4 | SMM Panel Providesmmpanelprovide.com | $0.055 | $0.115 | $0.0050 | Story Views: not verified | Post Comments: not verified | 0.14× | 76 | 8.7 |
| 5 | SMMPodsmmpod.com | $0.080 | Group Members: not verified | $0.0016 | $0.016 | Post Comments: not verified | 0.21× | 73 | 8.6 |
| 6 | Followizfollowiz.com | $0.198 | Group Members: not verified | $0.0027 | Story Views: not verified | $2.39 | 0.24× | 83 | 8.5 |
| 7 | SMMCostsmmcost.com | $0.0090 | $0.042 | $0.0015 | $0.120 | Post Comments: not verified | 0.22× | 71 | 8.4 |
| 8 | JustAnotherPaneljustanotherpanel.com | $0.118 | $0.840 | $0.0032 | $0.0088 | $2.49 | 0.48× | 84 | 8.1 |
| 9 | SMM X Panelsmmxpanel.com | $0.024 | Group Members: not verified | $0.0011 | $0.119 | $1.80 | 0.50× | 77 | 7.9 |
| 10 | LikeSMMlikesmm.net | $0.220 | $0.680 | $0.010 | Story Views: not verified | Post Comments: not verified | 0.23× | 77 | 7.8 |
| 11 | SMMPakPanelsmmpakpanel.com | Channel Members: not verified | $0.370 | $0.010 | $0.010 | Post Comments: not verified | 0.15× | 71 | 7.8 |
| 12 | Bulk Medyabulkmedya.org | $0.0063 | $0.042 | $0.0025 | $0.375 | $1.65 | 0.55× | 70 | 8.4 |
| 13 | PRM4Uprm4u.com | $0.100 | Group Members: not verified | $0.0010 | $0.0030 | $1.00 | 0.50× | 79 | 7.7 |
| 14 | SMM Panel Onesmmpanelone.com | $0.025 | $0.042 | $0.0013 | $0.038 | $0.065 | 0.36× | 77 | 7.6 |
| 15 | MoreThanPanelmorethanpanel.com | $0.0030 | $0.030 | $0.020 | Story Views: not verified | $3.72 | 0.53× | 85 | 7.9 |
A dash means we have not verified that value, which is different from a zero. Price position is a median against the market, so it is not distorted by a panel listing one unusually cheap service.
Members leave visibly. On Instagram or TikTok a dropped follower is invisible to everyone but the account owner; on a Telegram channel the member count is the product, displayed to every visitor, and a count that falls by a third overnight is public. That makes retention, and therefore the refill column, the column that matters most on this page. The second difference is that Telegram post views are close to free across the whole market, so a panel’s view pricing tells you almost nothing; its member pricing tells you everything.
By what happens after delivery, which the price predicts. The cheapest member services are accounts added in bulk that Telegram’s anti-spam systems remove in batches, sometimes within hours. Mid-market services survive longer because the accounts have some history. The distinguishing signal available before you buy is whether the panel commits to a refill window on members specifically, and how long: a panel prepared to replace drops for 30 days has made a bet on its supply that the market’s cheapest sellers have not. There is one check you can run after delivery and before you order again: watch the member count for a week. Bulk-added accounts are removed in batches rather than continuously, so a channel that holds its count for seven days has usually kept it, and a channel that sheds a third of it on day three has told you what the service is. That single observation is worth more than every quality label on the panel’s own listing.