across 29 platforms
individual rates
of 134 in the directory
Data captured from 61 panelsdaily price index
Rates on this page were read from panels’ own API catalogue endpoints or read from the price lists panels publish on their own sites — every listing says which on its service page, most recently on . Nothing here is an estimate, a reference range or a figure carried over from a page that no longer exists.
Ordered by how much of this index is backed by prices we have actually read, not by how large the platform is. A platform with no observed rate shows a dash rather than a reference range.
181,009 listed rates from 61 panels, read . Wide enough to read as a market rate.
| Platform | Services | Priced | Panels | Cheapest / 1k | Typical / 1k | Dearest / 1k | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instagram1 services with a unit trap | 15 | 14 | 58 | $0.00010 | $0.722 | $165,333,333.17 | 58 panels |
| TikTok1 services with a unit trap | 9 | 9 | 58 | $0.00010 | $0.252 | $165,333,333.17 | 57 panels |
| YouTube2 services with a unit trap | 12 | 12 | 56 | $0.00010 | $2.12 | $21,646.19 | 54 panels |
| Facebook1 services with a unit trap | 10 | 10 | 56 | $0.00010 | $1.50 | $11,111,111,111.00 | 55 panels |
| X (Twitter)1 services with a unit trap | 10 | 10 | 57 | $0.00010 | $6.00 | $1,488,000,000.00 | 56 panels |
| Telegram | 12 | 12 | 57 | $0.00010 | $0.591 | $122,200.00 | 53 panels |
| Spotify | 8 | 8 | 43 | $0.086 | $0.785 | $2,040.00 | 39 panels |
| Twitch3 services with a unit trap | 6 | 4 | 46 | $0.0076 | $0.453 | $11,111,111.00 | 43 panels |
| 8 | 8 | 50 | $0.145 | $27.34 | $35,100.00 | 46 panels | |
| Threads | 5 | 5 | 40 | $0.266 | $7.33 | $342.00 | 40 panels |
| Snapchat | 3 | 3 | 38 | $2.63 | $5.69 | $178.81 | 38 panels |
| 6 | 5 | 30 | $0.625 | $6.63 | $81.37 | 29 panels | |
| SoundCloud | 6 | 5 | 33 | $0.015 | $11.44 | $205.80 | 31 panels |
| Discord1 services with a unit trap | 4 | 4 | 31 | $1.05 | $3.89 | $61.74 | 31 panels |
| 6 | 6 | 32 | $0.00010 | $14.74 | $427.50 | 26 panels | |
| Kick1 services with a unit trap | 4 | 3 | 44 | $0.0091 | $2.27 | $207.69 | 39 panels |
| Rumble1 services with a unit trap | 4 | 3 | 20 | $0.547 | $6.81 | $34.02 | 17 panels |
| Shazam | 1 | 1 | 12 | $1.00 | $7.20 | $22.50 | 12 panels |
| Apple Music | 1 | 1 | 19 | $4.00 | $6.69 | $17.16 | 19 panels |
| Deezer | 2 | 2 | 18 | $0.403 | $1.31 | $10.00 | 17 panels |
| Audiomack | 2 | 2 | 26 | $0.026 | $3.52 | $33.80 | 23 panels |
| Vimeo | 2 | 2 | 15 | $0.300 | $3.16 | $108.00 | 14 panels |
| VK (VKontakte) | 3 | 3 | 26 | $0.0013 | $0.910 | $300.38 | 23 panels |
| WhatsApp Channels | 2 | 2 | 43 | $0.018 | $2.03 | $178.00 | 43 panels |
| Quora1 services with a unit trap | 3 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | 2 panels — below the publication threshold |
| Clubhouse | 2 | 1 | 8 | $11.71 | $517.50 | $1,840.00 | 8 panels |
| OnlyFans1 services with a unit trap | 2 | 1 | 23 | $1.00 | $76.75 | $375,000.00 | 23 panels |
| Business Reviews (Trustpilot / Google / TripAdvisor)3 services with a unit trap | 3 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | 16 panels |
| Website Traffic | 7 | 7 | 40 | $0.0011 | $0.483 | $8,000.00 | 36 panels |
We hold live rates for these, but every service on them is sold by a single panel in our index. A median over one seller is that seller’s price list, so no index row is published — the rates are on the platform pages, unaggregated.
| Platform | Services | Priced | Panels | Cheapest / 1k | Typical / 1k | Dearest / 1k | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Behance | 2 | — | 1 | — | — | — | — |
13 platforms the market trades in, which no panel we have synced currently sells. They are here because the catalogue describes the market rather than our coverage of it, and each page says plainly that it has no prices rather than showing an estimate.
19 of the 182 services in this catalogue are sold in a unit that a price per 1,000 does not describe. Their pages list every rate and deliberately put them in no order.
Panels quote almost everything per 1,000, including things that are not counts. A live viewer is a slot held for a length of time the panel chooses and rarely publishes. A YouTube watch hour is an order quantity that converts into real hours at a rate set by the video length the panel demands, so two panels quoting the same number can differ several-fold on what arrives. A Discord boost is a package with a minimum and a maximum of one. A Google review is priced per review and published in the per-1,000 field regardless, which produces a headline figure a thousand times the real price.
Every directory in this niche ranks these cheapest-first beside ordinary count services. Sorting them puts the panel that discloses least at the top, because the undisclosed variable is exactly what a low number is hiding. So we do not sort them. The rates are published, the unit is explained on each page, and the ordering is withheld on purpose.
Every rate is read from the panel itself — its own API catalogue endpoint where we hold a key, or the price list it publishes on its own site where we do not — dated, and written to an append-only log. Each listing says which of the two it came from. Once at least two independent panels sell the same canonical service, a daily index row records the minimum, the quartiles, the median and the maximum across every listing they publish for it, together with the number of distinct sellers behind those listings.
Those two counts are different and the difference matters. A single panel routinely lists hundreds of variants of one service — different countries, different refill windows, different account pools — so a median is computed over listings, because that is the distribution a buyer actually chooses from, while the sample size counts panels, because one seller is not a market however many rows it publishes. Both are shown. A page that printed the first and called it the second would have invented hundreds of businesses.
Nothing on these pages is an estimate. Where a service has no observed rate the cell is a dash. Where the sample is below 5 independent sellers, the page says so, keeps itself out of the search index and out of the sitemap, and shows the rates anyway — because the data is real even when the word “market” is not yet earned.
It is shown per row rather than claimed in general, because it varies and because it is currently small. Across the 146 services with a published index figure today, medians rest on between 2 and 58 panels — we have read live catalogues from 61 of the 134 panels in the directory. This site publishes a ranking from 5 independent sellers up; below that the figures are shown, the page says how thin it is, and it stays out of the index.
Almost always because it is a different product. Delivery geography is the largest driver: a worldwide order and one restricted to a single country are sourced from different account pools and can differ by two orders of magnitude for the same nominal service. After that come the refill window — a panel that replaces units that drop has to fund the replacements — the account quality behind the delivery, and where the panel sits in the supply chain, since a reseller marks up whatever its upstream provider charges it.
Because no panel whose catalogue we have read currently lists them. The service catalogue is the market’s catalogue, not ours: a row exists here because panels trade it, and it shows a dash rather than an estimate when we have not seen a rate for it. We do not fill those gaps with reference ranges, because a reference range printed in a price column reads as an observation.
19 of the 182 services in the catalogue are sold in a unit that a per-1,000 figure does not describe — live viewer-slots held for an undisclosed session length, YouTube watch hours whose quantity converts to real hours at a rate the panel sets, Discord boosts sold one package at a time, reviews priced per review and published per thousand. Their pages list every rate and deliberately refuse to order them, because ordering them would assert an equivalence that does not exist.