PanelFollows
5.0overallPrices 71% below the market median. 40/100 trust (unproven).
Coverage is still narrow. Live prices have been read from 1 of 129 panels (2,182 services). The rest are listed because they are real, reachable operators — not because we have seen their rates. Panels with no synced catalogue show no prices rather than an estimate. How the data is gathered.
Nearly every panel in this index sells Instagram services, so filtering by platform would just reprint the main ranking. This list is built the other way round: we price each panel’s Instagram catalogue against the market median for those same Instagram services, and rank on that.
How this ranking is produced: Panels selling at least three of Instagram followers, likes, video views, reels views and story views, ranked by their prices for those five services weighted evenly with their overall score. The order is generated by that query at build time — there is no editorial override anywhere in it.
Data captured from 1 panels
Only 1 panel matches this filter, which is too few for a ranking to mean much. The page is kept out of search results until it has more behind it.
Prices 71% below the market median. 40/100 trust (unproven).
| # | Panel | Followersper 1,000 | Likesper 1,000 | Video Viewsper 1,000 | Reels Viewsper 1,000 | Story Viewsper 1,000 | vs marketmedian of ratios | Trust | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PanelFollowspanelfollows.com | $0.010 | $0.044 | $0.0019 | Reels Views: not verified | $0.120 | 0.29× | 40 | 5.0 |
A dash means we have not verified that value, which is different from a zero. Price position is a median against the market, so it is not distorted by a panel listing one unusually cheap service.
Price on followers, mostly. Instagram followers are the most expensive mainstream service in this market by a wide margin — often two orders of magnitude above views — so a panel’s follower price dominates what an Instagram-focused buyer actually spends, however cheap its views are. The second differentiator is retention, which no panel advertises honestly and which shows up in the refill column instead: a panel willing to commit to a 30- or 90-day refill window is making a statement about its supply that a panel with no refill policy is not.
They are worth exactly what the drop rate makes them worth, and the drop rate is what the price is telling you. The cheapest follower services in this market are recycled accounts that Instagram removes in waves, which is why the refill window is the single most useful column on this page: a panel offering no cover on followers is pricing for a product it expects to disappear. The price table on each Instagram service page shows the full spread across every panel that sells it, so you can see where a given quote sits before you commit.